| Company | Last | Title | First | Middle | Vote | Comments |
| Savvy Optics Corp. | Aikens | Mr. | David |
|
Yes |
|
| JDSU | Boultbee | Mr. | Gordon | H. | Yes |
|
| JDSU | Catching | Mr. | Benjamin | F. | No reply |
|
| Individual | Corridon | Mr. | David |
|
No reply |
|
| APOMA | Czajkowski | Mr. | Walter |
|
Yes |
|
| Optimax Systems, Inc. | DeGroote Nelson | Dr. | Jessica | E. | Yes |
|
| IEEE Photonics Society | Dowell | Dr. | Marla |
|
Yes |
|
| SPIE (Endelman Enterprises) | Endelman | Mr. | Lincoln |
|
No reply |
|
| OSA (NIST) | Griesmann |
|
Ulf |
|
No reply |
|
| Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems | Howland | Ms. | Donna |
|
Yes |
|
| Harold Johnson Optical Lab | Johnson | Mr. | Hal |
|
Yes |
|
| Triptar Lens Co., Inc. | Krisiloff | Mr. | Allen |
|
Yes |
|
| Individual | Royall | Mr. | William | E. | Yes, with comments | My only concern is the handling of decimal points rather than commas. First, the decimal seems to have made its way into text that the foreword implies is verbatim ISO 10110 text. This represents an opportunity for confusion. Second, I know that some of the modern design software can handle ASME Y14.5 or ISO 10110 interchangeably. How will those packages handle our "hybrid" of mostly ISO 10110 with decimals? The text boxes in the standard and the foreword lead the user to the alternate US standards very well. |
| Brookhaven National Lab. | Takacs | Dr. | Peter |
|
No reply |
|
| Ray Williamson Consulting | Williamson | Mr. | Ray |
|
Yes, with comments | Comments for ballot BSRIOEOSC OP1.110-1 Page 7, line 2: Space needed between “Figure” and “9” Page 10, 4.6.2, third from final paragraph: Should be an ANS Note. This is clearly not from the ISO text. Page 14, 4.6.7, paragraph 2 gives an example of a penta prism and states that the perpendicularity of the penta’s respective sides to its base are “pyramidal angles.” Paragraph 4 states that an error in "ray deviation perpendicular to the plane of the drawing" is known is a “pyramidal deviation error;” and then refers to Figure 28 b. Issues: Neither of these paragraphs defines “pyramidal error” the way I understand it — as the deviation of one surface normal to a plane formed by two other surface normals (typically the two legs of a right-angle prism vs. its hypotenuse.) Figure 28 b shows parallelism to the base surface, datum A, which is not necessarily perpendicular to the “plane of the drawing.” In fact, in 28 b it’s parallel to the plane of that drawing — it is nominally perpendicular to the plane of 28 a. I think we need to help ISO in this regard with a better explanation. 3rd angle projection not per ANSI style fig 28 (at least) Page 17 section 4.8.3 last line says “see Figure 29.” It would be helpful to place figure 29 immediately after this line. |
| Count - Vote | Vote |
|
|
|
| Company | Yes, with comments | Yes | No reply | Total Result |
| APOMA |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| Brookhaven National Lab. |
|
|
1 | 1 |
| Harold Johnson Optical Lab |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| IEEE Photonics Society |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| Individual | 1 |
|
1 | 2 |
| JDSU |
|
1 | 1 | 2 |
| Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| Optimax Systems, Inc. |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| OSA (NIST) |
|
|
1 | 1 |
| Ray Williamson Consulting | 1 |
|
|
1 |
| Savvy Optics Corp. |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| SPIE (Endelman Enterprises) |
|
|
1 | 1 |
| Triptar Lens Co., Inc. |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| Total Result | 2 | 8 | 5 | 15 |
There are 14 members since there are two unique individuals. The ballot passes with 10 votes that are positive.
Bill Royall has expressed concern about changing the European decimal comma in the US version. ISO instructions explicitly state that changes from British English spelling to US spelling and the replacement of decimal commas does not constitute a change to the standard. The phrase, "except for US spelling and the substitution of the decimal point for the decimal comma" has been added to the sentence in the ANS Foreword.
Ray Williams' editorial comments concerning pages 7 and 10 are being incorporated.
The Task Force Leader has decided that Ray William's comments concerning items on page 14 will be deferred at this time. The issue will be brought to the attention of ISO/TC 172/SC 1 for review during a future revision of the ISO version.
He asked that figure 29 be moved; however, the figure is first referenced at the beginning of clause 4.8.3. Its current location is on the left page and will still be in view when the reference at the end of clause 4.8.3 is reached on the right page. So the figure will be left where is currently is located.
This draft is ready to be presented to ASC OP for approval so that it can be submitted to ANSI for final release as an American National Standard.